The aortic uncrossing procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Cross-sectional imaging allows identification of rare patients with a vascular ring and circumflex aorta. The key diagnostic feature is crossing of the transverse aortic arch from right to left posterior to the trachea and superior to the carina in a patient with a right aortic arch. We evaluated our patients who received an aortic uncrossing procedure. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent aortic uncrossing from 2002 to 2022. All patients received preoperative computed tomography imaging and bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Eleven patients ranging in age from 1.5 to 10 years (median 4 years) underwent aortic uncrossing. Two patients had prior left ligamentum division, and 3 patients had prior left aortic arch division. All had significant clinical symptoms. Eight patients had deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (mean 34 minutes), and 3 patients had antegrade cerebral perfusion (median, 28 minutes). Patch material was not used for aortic augmentation, and no patient underwent a posterior tracheopexy or rotational esophagoplasty. Postoperative length of stay ranged from 4 to 31 days (median, 5 days). One patient required a temporary tracheostomy for bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis, which recovered. One patient required an aortic extension graft to alleviate esophageal compression from an unusual ectatic esophageal course. All patients had relief of airway symptoms and dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: In properly selected patients with a right aortic arch and circumflex aorta, aortic uncrossing is a safe and effective therapy to treat airway and esophageal compression. The procedure can be conducted with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest or antegrade cerebral perfusion. Careful attention to the location of the esophagus and recurrent laryngeal nerves is required.

Contemporary Applications and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Banding: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery banding (PAB) in isolation or combined with a congenital cardiac surgical procedure is common and has important mortality. We aimed to determine patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, variation in clinical outcomes by diagnoses, and center variation in PAB use. METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS CHSD), this study evaluated outcomes of patients undergoing PAB across diagnoses, participating centers, and additional procedures. Patients were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes from 2016 to 2019. We separated patients into groups of main and bilateral PAB and described their outcomes, focusing on patients with main PAB. RESULTS: This study identified 3367 PAB procedures from 2016 to 2019 (3% of all STS CHSD cardiovascular cases during this period): 2677 main PAB, 690 bilateral PAB. Operative mortality was 8% after main PAB and 26% after bilateral PAB. There was significant variation in use of main PAB by center, with 115 centers performing at least 1 main PAB procedure (range, 1-134; Q1-Q3, 8-33). For patients with main PAB, there were substantial differences in mortality, depending on timing of main PAB relative to other procedures. The highest operative mortality (25%; P < .0001) was in patients who underwent main PAB after another separate procedure during their admission, with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation being the most frequent preceding procedure. CONCLUSIONS: PAB is a frequently used congenital cardiac procedure with high mortality and variation in use across centers. Outcomes vary widely by banding type and patient diagnosis. Main PAB after cardiac surgical procedures, especially extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, is associated with very high operative mortality.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States.

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Recommendations for centers performing pediatric heart surgery in the United States.

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

The Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society Presidents and Their Contributions.

The Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society (CHSS) was founded by 16 congenital heart surgeons in 1973, who endeavored to share their clinical advances in an informal setting that would stimulate honest and forthright discussions. As the Society grew, prospective studies were organized from a centralized data center that was established and based first in Birmingham, Alabama, thence to Toronto, and recently in a collaboration between Toronto and the Cleveland Clinic. These studies formed the basis for a myriad of outcomes reports that favorably impacted surgical results. The Kirklin-Ashburn Fellowship was created and endowed by the membership which has been successful in training many congenital heart surgeons. The CHSS was then incorporated into a 501(c) (3) not-for-profit organization with bylaws, officers, and committees in 2002. Increased membership followed. The CHSS has become the face of congenital heart surgery in North America by affiliating with the World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, having one designated member on the American Board of Thoracic Surgery, and hosting joint meetings with the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association. Since 2002, 11 presidents have been elected for two-year terms and have guided the advances that have been achieved by the CHSS. Their contributions and achievements are highlighted in chronological order.

World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery-The Official Journal of the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society.

The World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery (WJPCHS) was established in 2009, as a means of advancing the educational and scholarship goals of the World Society for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. WJPCHS has grown steadily since the first issue was published in April 2010. In 2017, the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association both designated WJPCHS as the official journal of their respective organizations. The CHSS and ECHSA represent the face and the voice of congenital heart surgery in North America (United States and Canada) and in Europe, respectively. Each organization has advanced the science of surgical management of congenital heart disease through multicenter outcomes analyses, which have strongly and positively influenced the care of patients around the world.

Recommendations for Centers Performing Pediatric Heart Surgery in the United States.

Care and outcomes for the more than 40,000 patients undergoing pediatric and congenital heart surgery in the United States annually are known to vary widely. While consensus recommendations have been published across numerous fields as one mechanism to promote a high level of care delivery across centers, it has been more than two decades since the last pediatric heart surgery recommendations were published in the United States. More recent guidance is lacking, and collaborative efforts involving the many disciplines engaged in caring for these children have not been undertaken to date. The present initiative brings together professional societies spanning numerous care domains and congenital cardiac surgeons, pediatric cardiologists, nursing, and other healthcare professionals from diverse programs around the country to develop consensus recommendations for United States centers. The focus of this initial work is on pediatric heart surgery, and it is recommended that future efforts focus in detail on the adult congenital population. We describe the background, rationale, and methodology related to this collaborative effort, and recommendations put forth for Essential Care Centers (essential services necessary for any program), and Comprehensive Care Centers (services to optimize comprehensive and high-complexity care), encompassing structure, process, and outcome metrics across 14 domains.

Contemporary Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes in Congenital Heart Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the volume-outcome relationship in congenital heart surgery (CHS) are more than a decade old. Since then, mortality has declined, and case-mix adjustment has evolved. We determined the current relationship between hospital CHS volume and outcomes. METHODS: Patients aged ≤18 years undergoing index operations in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2017-2020) were included. Associations between annual hospital volume and case-mix-adjusted operative mortality, major complications, failure to rescue (FTR), and postoperative length of stay (PLOS) were assessed using Bayesian hierarchical models, overall, by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) category, and for the Norwood procedure. RESULTS: Across 101 centers (76,714 index operations), median annual volume was 144 operations/y. Operative mortality was 2.7%. Lower-volume hospitals had higher mortality, with an apparent transition zone at ∼190 operations/y (95% credible interval [CrI], 115-450 operations/y), below which a sustained uptick in the estimated odds of death occurred. Odds of death compared with a 450 operations/y reference were 50 operations/y (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CrI, 1.41-2.37), 100 operations/y (OR, 1.37; 95% CrI, 1.08-1.71), 200 operations/y (OR, 0.92; 95% CrI, 0.1-1.18), 300 operations/y (OR, 0.89; 95% CrI, 0.76-1.04). The volume-outcome effect was more apparent for STAT 4 to 5 than STAT 1 to 3 operations. In the overall cohort, PLOS and complications were similar across hospital volumes, whereas FTR rates were higher at lower-volume hospitals. Lower-volume hospitals had worse outcomes after the Norwood procedure, most notably mortality and FTR. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume is associated with mortality and FTR after CHS. The relationship is strongest for high-risk operations. These data can inform ongoing initiatives to improve CHS care.

Regionalization or Access to Care? A Joint Pediatric Heart Care Program That Achieves Both: One Program-Two Sites.

Background: Regionalization of care for children with congenital heart disease has been proposed as a method to improve outcomes. This has raised concerns about limiting access to care. We present the details of a joint pediatric heart care program (JPHCP) which utilized regionalization and actually improved access to care. Methods: In 2017, Kentucky Children's Hospital (KCH) launched the JPHCP with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC). This unique satellite model was the product of several years of planning, leading to a comprehensive strategy with shared personnel, conferences, and a robust transfer system; "one program-two sites." Results: Between March 2017 and the end of June 2022, 355 operations were performed at KCH under the auspices of the JPHCP. As of the most recent published Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) outcome report (through the end of June 2021), for all STAT categories, the JPHCP at KCH outperformed the STS overall in postoperative length of stay, and the mortality rate was lower than expected for the case mix. Of the 355 operations, there were 131 STAT 1, 148 STAT 2, 40 STAT 3, and 36 STAT 4 operations, with two operative mortalities: an adult undergoing surgery for Ebstein anomaly, and a premature infant who died from severe lung disease many months after aortopexy. Conclusions: With a select case mix, and by affiliating with a large volume congenital heart center, the creation of the JPHCP at KCH was able to achieve excellent congenital heart surgery results. Importantly, access to care was improved for those children at the more remote location utilizing this one program-two sites model.